The analysis of the discourse of Hafez's sonnets focused on the concept of sin

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate professor of Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD student in Persian language and literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

CDA Crisis Discourse Analysis is an interdisciplinary trend that began to emerge from the mid-1960s through the mid-1970s following the widespread scientific and epistemic changes in the social and human sciences interested in exploring the discursive dimensions of social action. This approach uses sociological theories of Karl-Max, Antonio Gramsci, Louis Althusser, and others in the study of social ideologies. In the foregoing research, we have tried to analyze the concept of guilty in Hafez's poetry using this approach, usng the method of analyzing qualitative content, and elucidating how the poet's attitude towards this static concept is extracted through his poems. The result of the research shows that by adapting the theory of discourse analysis to the extracted evidence from Hafez's poetry, one can look at this poet with a different attitude. Since it is at least very difficult to obtain historical facts, if not impossible, we must examine the remaining texts with an all-round view; thus, in this research, we tried to analyze the existing data with the critical theory of discourse We will present a distinct interpretation and explanation alongside a lot of interpretations.
 
 

Keywords

References

References
- Bakhtin, M. (1984), Problems of Dostoevskys Poetics, C. Emerson (transl and ed.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Cook, G. (2001), The Discourse of Advertising, (2nd. edition) London: Routledge.
- Firth, J. R. (1957), Papers in Linguistics (1913-51), London: Oxford University Perss.
- Fowler, R. (1996), Linguistic criticism. (second edition), Oxford University press.
- Savan, D. (1988), An Introduction to C.S. Peirces Peirces Full System of Semeiotic, Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.
- Talja, S. (1997), Constituting Information and User as Research Objects: A theory of knoledge formations as an alternative to the information man theory, London: Taylor Graham Publishing.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics