نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
.
The first step in recognizing, examining and criticizing a poet is to have a work by him that has undergone the least change and occupation. In the leading article, after introducing some ancient and valuable copies of Anvari's poems, the difference between the poems and pieces in Anvari's divan is corrected by Modarres's correction with this exquisite copy. The importance of paying attention to these differences becomes apparent when examining the literary and linguistic status of poems that are listed in ancient versions but do not exist in the two aforementioned corrections. These poems are from Anvari due to their stylistic features, and not registering them in the existing editions will cause Anvari's Divan to be incomplete. The non-recording of these poems (even due to ethics) and on the other hand the recording of poems that are not Anwari according to their stylistic features and ancient versions, makes any study of Anvari poetry, style, features and its critique impossible. Therefore, after a complete review of the eight ancient and original manuscripts of Anvari's poems, a comprehensive list of all the poems and fragments contained in this copy was prepared, and finally the difference between this list and the poems and fragments in Anvari's Divan Modares's correction by tables. In order to confirm the accuracy of their attribution to Anvari according to the number of times a poem or a piece has been recorded in the manuscript and also to examine their stylistic features, in order to comment on Anvari's poetry, its features and its critique.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)