نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
In the current research, the commentaries of Anvari's Divan are examined and compared. Among the old and new commentators of Anvari's poems, Shadiabadi in the 10th century, Farahani in the 11th century, Donboli in the 13th century, and Modares Razavi and Seyyed Jafar Shahidi in the contemporary era can be mentioned. These commentators have explained and analyzed Anvari's verses, especially the difficulties and problems of his divan, and each of them has tried to solve some of its problems to the best of their ability, From the analysis of these commentaries, it is understood that Shadiabadi's commentary has greatly influenced other commentaries, and among the contemporary commentators, Modares and Shahidi were completely influenced by the previous commentaries. Each of these interpretations, while having advantages, has shortcomings and weaknesses, which are shown in the explanation of some verses of this article. In the analysis of the selected verses, commentators sometimes acted differently and did not follow the same method. Shadiabadi, while interpreting the words and meaning of the verse, has sometimes discussed the influence of his poetic art. Farahani's description is more scholarly and he has referred to other sources and books in the analysis of the verses. Donboli has explained all the verses of the poems. In his commentaries on Diwan Anuri, Madras Razavi has turned to the explanation and meaning of some verses, and Shahidi, while paying attention to all these explanations, has summarized the meaning of the verses and criticized the opinions of other commentators.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)