ریخت‌شناسی منظومۀ محب و محبوب بر اساس الگوی ولادیمیر پراپ

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار ، گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکده ادبیات و زبان های خارجی، دانشگاه کاشان.،کاشان. ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکده ادبیات و زبان های خارجی، دانشگاه کاشان. کاشان. ایران

چکیده

منظومۀ محب و محبوب، مثنوی­ای عاشقانه به­شیوۀ ده­نامه­های فارسی­ است که شاعری با نام یا تخلص اختیار آن را در قرن نهم سروده­است.  مقالۀ حاضر بر آن است که بر اساس دیدگاه ریخت ­شناسی پراپ (۱۸۹۵- ۱۹۷۰م.) ساختار روایی این داستان ناشناخته را بررسی ­نماید. نگارندگان با روش توصیفی- تحلیلی مبتنی بر متن منظومه، می­ کوشند به این پرسش ­که ساختار داستان محب و محبوب بر اساس الگوی ریخت ­شناسی قصه­ های پریان پراپ چگونه است؟ پاسخ دهند. یافته ­های نشان­ می­دهد ساختار داستان از بیست خویشکاری، یک حرکت و پنج شخصیت تشکیل شده ­است، داستان فاقد شخصیت شرور است و عنصر یاری­ دهنده نقش پررنگی در روند داستان دارد؛ تاجایی ­که در برخی موارد نقش اصلی  را یاریگران برعهده­دارند و در نقش جستجوگر ظاهرمی­شوند. این داستان از نوع داستان­های یک حرکتی است و بررسی ژرف­ ساخت آن نشان­ می­دهد که ساختار داستان تحت تأثیر آیین­های باروری شکل­ گرفته است. با توجه به  وجود ده شخصیت­ یاریگر  و ملازم  محب،  باد صبا، اقالیم هفتگانه، هدهد و دیگر پرندگان نمادین،  می­ توان این داستان را جزءِ داستان‌های رمزی درنظرگرفت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Morphology of the Poem Moheb and Mahboub Based on Vladimir Propp’s Model

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Sadat Taheri 1
  • Najmeh Nabavi 2
1 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Foreign Languages, University of Kashan. Kashan. Iran.
2 2. PhD student in Persian language and literature. Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Foreign Languages, University of Kashan. Kashan. Iran.
چکیده [English]

The poem "Moheb and Mahboub" is a romantic Mathnavi in the style of Persian Ten Letters, composed by a poet by the name or pen name of Ekhtiar in the ninth century. This article attempts to examine the narrative structure of this unknown story from the perspective of Propp (1895-1970) using a morphological approach. The authors examine the structure of the story 'Moheb and Mahboub', using a descriptive-analytical method based on the text of the poem and the morphological framework of Propp's fairy tales. The findings reveal that the structure of the story comprises twenty functions, one movement, and five characters. The plot lacks a villain, and the supporting element plays a prominent role in the story's flow, to the extent that in some cases, the supporting characters take on the main roles and even appear as seekers in the story. The story features one move, and an in-depth study of its structure shows that fertility rituals influenced the story's structure. Considering the presence of ten characters who help and accompany the Moheb, the Saba wind, the seven countries, the Hudhud, and other symbolic birds, this story can be considered a metaphorical story.
Introduction
In 1928, Propp laid the foundation for the theory of structuralism in narratology by studying the morphology of Russian fairy tales. Inspired by the ideas of Ferdinand de Saussure, he proposed the morphological model (one of the foundational concepts of structural criticism) in his book Morphology of the Folktale. According to Propp, only when we move from theme and content to form and structure can we regularize the beginning, development, and ending of all fairy tales worldwide. Propp's method, especially in the separation of story and plot, was significantly influenced by the formalists. He categorized folk tales based on their formal rules and called the product of his work Morphology of the Folktale, which he defined as the description of tales based on their constituent elements and the relation of these structures to each other and to the whole tale. According to this view, by analyzing all stories, a single structure can ultimately be achieved in all of them; therefore, by structurally analyzing the story of the unknown Moheb and the Mahboub, authors try to study the functions and their sequence in different roles of the story and, by comparing them with Propp's theory, to determine the extent to which these functions conform to the features present in the story.

Materials and Methods

Using a descriptive-analytical method, the authors try to answer these questions: What is the structure of the story according to Propp's theory of fairy tale morphology? How many of Propp's thirty-one functions are observed in the poem 'Moheb and Mahboub'? What is the pattern of plot movement in this poem? What are the characteristics of the plot in terms of structure, character, and characterization? To this end, after extracting the data and analyzing them based on Propp's theory of morphology, the extent to which this story conforms to this theory will be studied.

Results and Discussion

In light of the studies conducted based on Propp's model, the story of "Moheb and Mahboub” has the following features: The opening scene (not among functions), absence, need, mission and the difficult task, lament or song, meeting with the helper, prohibition and warning of something, reaction of friends, breach of prohibition, intermediacy, connecting event departure, preparation gift with a material nature, hero riding on horse, consent to confrontation, reaction, getting information from other people, announcement of calamity, need for a bride, asking for help, need for helper, guide, receiving news from other sources, hero being shown the way, recognizing the hero, working out calamity, "healing" doing the difficult task, obtaining the sought-after object, getting married, sitting on the throne, and receiving the reward.
Propp proves the existence of seven characters in stories: villain, generous, helper, princess, dispatcher, hero, and false hero. He explains the characters’ field of action in three relationships:

The field of action is proportional to the character himself and his will.
A character willingly participates in the field of action of another.
Several characters operate in the same field of action.

The characters in the story of Moheb and Mahboub are: the hero, the valiant, the loving seeker: Moheb; the princess, Mahboub’s father, the King of China; The generous: Mahboub’s father; Helpers: Moheb’s friends, Nosrat, and young friends, birds, Hudhud, and the Saba wind; the dispatcher: Nosrat, Hudhud, and the Saba wind. Of the seven characters mentioned in Propp's model, there are five: the hero, the princess, the generous, the helper, and the dispatcher. An important detail is that the villain and anti-hero play no role in this text, which reveals the difference between this story and fairy tales. Here, the prince sees the princess in his dream and falls in love with her, and in fact, he also plays the role of the generous. At the beginning of the story, Moheb's friends play the role of the dispatcher and become his helpers as the story continues. By studying the story of the Moheb and the Mahboub, it is clear that the movements in this story are of the second type, according to the above classification; that is, the development of the plot is tied to the mission being completed. The mission involves finding the beloved whom the lover has seen in his dream. The people around the lover prevent him from doing the difficult task (which in their opinion, is an impossible task), but the lover does not give up. The movement in this text is of the single-movement type in terms of theme and content. This story begins with a lack and a need and ends with marriage and kingship. In fact, the story begins with an initial balance. With a dream, this balance is disrupted, and the search for the princess begins. Helpers enter the scene one after another, and finally, with the help of Hudhud and the Saba wind, the princess is found, and with the hero's wedding and kingship, balance is restored. The plot has a uniform course. The protagonist falling in love during sleep and becoming aware of the time of death in a dream shows that sleep and dreams are very important elements in this love story, as in others. Likewise, the marriage of Mahboub at the beginning of spring shows that the author paid great attention to the myth of fertility, of which spring (considered a symbol of the rebirth of nature) is a central part. The hero receives help from natural forces such as the Saba wind, birds like the parrot, nightingale, hawk, pigeon, cuckoo, Huma, and especially the mythical Hudhud, along with the character of the fairy, who is so important that the beloved makes the lover’s distance from her a condition for marriage. This shows that this story also has a cryptic and symbolic aspect. Another notable point in this story, which distinguishes it from other fairy tales, is the abundance of educational points and the poet's great attention to seeking counsel in important matters.

Conclusion

The analysis of the poem Moheb and Mahboub based on Propp's theory shows that this story is compatible with the morphological theory in many ways, and in most cases, Propp's model is consistent with the text. The story begins with an initial equilibrium before the crisis. Among Propp's functions, twenty functions are seen in this system. Need, Intermediacy, meeting with the helper, prohibition, and violation of prohibition are the most frequent functions of this story, while functions related to evil and struggle are not present. This absence marks the most important difference between this story and other fairy tales. As Propp himself notes, however, it is not possible for all functions to appear in every story.
Among the seven characters that Propp presents in the morphology of fairy tales, five characters are seen in this story: the hero, the princess, the generous, the helper, and the dispatcher. Here, the role of the helper is very prominent, to the point that in some cases the helpers take on the main role of the story and appear as the seeker. An interesting feature of this text is the absence of a villain and antihero, a character who is considered one of the main features in morphology and structural analysis. This poem is a one-movement story that begins with the function of lack and need and, after passing through intermediary functions, ends with marriage and ascension to kingdom. An important aspect of the plot is the symbolism reflected in several main characters. Considering the ten young friends, attendants, and Moheb's friends (whose names themselves indicate their symbolic nature) along with the Saba wind, the seven countries, the Hudhud, and other symbolic birds, it is reasonable to consider this story as a symbol. This is especially true given that moral and educational concepts are expressed at various points throughout this lyrical poem. There are motifs and elements in the story of the lover and the beloved that can be seen in fertility myths; the Moheb's journey to the second country, finding the beloved, their marriage in spring, and his becoming the king, strengthen the mythical connection between this story and fertility rituals.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Morphology
  • Vladimir Propp
  • Moheb and Mahboub
  • Narratology
  • Function
 اختیار (1390). محب و محبوب، تصحیح احمدرضا یلمه‌ها، دهاقان: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد دهاقان.
 اسکولز، رابرت، (۱۳۸۳). درآمدی بر ساختار گرایی در ادبیات. ترجمۀ فرزانه طاهری، چاپ دوم تهران: آگه.
افشین وفایی، محمد.(1392).«جعبه­آینه کتاب (9): معرفی و نقد کتاب های تازه).‌ بخارا، ش.  92،صص426- 445.
آقاحسینی، حسین و جمالی، فاطمه .(1384).«بررسی و تحلیل بازتاب هدهد در ادب  فارسی».‌  دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی ش.  43و42، صص 227- 250.
   امینی،کیمیا  و همکاران. (1404). «بررسی بازتاب  تخیلی عنصر باد در منطق الطیر عطار نیشابوری با رویکرد به نظرِیه تخیل ژیلبر دوران». ‌ادبیات عرفانی و اسطوره شناختی.ش.  78.صص 41- 72.
ایگلتون،تری،(1368).پیش درآمدی بر نظریۀ ادبی.ترجمه عباس مخبر.چاپ اول ،تهران:نشر مرکز.
بایرام حقیقی، رقیه و رحیم­پور، مهدی.(1400).«نسخه ای تازه از مثنوی«محب و محبوب» و اهمیت آن در تصحیح  دوباره منظومه» متن شناسی ادب فارسی، ش50. صص96-75.
         doi. 10.22108/rpll.2021.125930.1799
براتی­خوانساری، محمود و ابن­علی­چرمهینی، حسین.(1399). «بررسی کارکردهای نظریۀ پراپ در اسرارالتوحید». متن­پژوهی ادبی، سال 24،ش.  83، صص257- 295. doi.
پراپ، ولادیمیر، (۱۳۶۸). ریخت­شناسی قصه­های پریان، ترجمه م.کاشیگر. تهران: میخک.
پراپ، ولادیمیر، (۱۳۶۸).ریخت شناسی قصه­های پریان، ترجمۀ فریدون بدره‌ای، تهران: توس.
تمیم­داری،  احمد و عباسی، سمانه .(1391). «نقد و تحلیل ساختاری و نشانه شناسی داستان های عاشقانه». سبک­شناسی نظم و نثر فارسی، سال پنجم، ش. 15 ،صص ۲۶-۲۹.
توفیق­سبحانی، ه.(1373). فهرست نسخه­های خطی فارسی کتابخانه­های  ترکیه (22 کتابخانه). تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
خادم­عرب­باغی، هادی و حسن­زاده­نیری، محمدحسن، (1404)، «طبقه‌بندی نخستین برخورد عشاق در منظومه‌های عاشقانه‌ی فارسی»، پژوهشنامه متون ادبی دورۀ عراقی، انتشار آنلاین:
         doi10.22126/ltip.2024.10857.1274..
رجبعلی­زاده­جلودار، مجتبی. (1402).«خواب و رؤیا در شاهنامه».  مطالعات  راهبردی علوم انسانی و اسلامی، ش.  55 صص237- 246. 
ریک، فیلیپ (1375). ساختارگرایی، ترجمه احمد ابومحبوب، ادبیات داستانی، ش29، صص16- 21.
 سرامکادن، جی ای. (1380). فرهنگ ادبیات نقدی. ترجمۀ کاظم فیروزمند، تهران: شادگان.
شیخی، علیرضا و ساکی، سحر.(1400). «تحلیل ریخت­شناسانۀ داستان «طواحین بیروت» توفیق عواد براساس روش پراپ».  نقد ادب  معاصر عربی، ش. 20. ،صص153- 179.
          doi.  10.22034/mcal.2021.14655.2050
عزتی، سمیه  و همکاران.(1402). «تحلیل ریخت­شناسانۀ داستان اسکند و دارا در شرفنامه بر اساس نظریۀ ریخت­شناسی ولادیمیر پراپ».‌ مطالعات ادبیات تطبیقی، ش. 65،صص 132- 145.
          doi.  10.30495/clq.2023.1907539.1972
فرای، نورتروپ (۱۳۸۴). صحیفه‌های زمینی. ترجمۀ هوشنگ رهنما. تهران: هرمس.
فرهنگ آکسفورد، (1393)، مترجم: ابوالقاسم طلوع، تهران: جنگل.
کرد، زهرا؛ صادقی­شهپر، رضا؛ جمالی، شهروز. (1403).«شکل­شناسی قصۀ عامیانۀ دارابنامه بیغمی». تفسیر و تحلیل متون زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دوره16، ش. 62، صص418- 449.   
کریمی قره­بابا، سعید و صبری، ربابه. (1401). «نگاهی به خواب و تاثیر آن در افسانه­های آذربایجان». مطالعات راهبردی علوم انسانی و اسلامی، سال چهارم، ش  48، صص127- 145.
گرین، ویلفرد و دیگران.(1400). مبانی نقد ادبی، ترجمه فرزانه طاهری، تهران: نیلوفر.
 گلدمن، لوسین، (۱۳۶۹). نقد تکوینی. ترجمه محمدتقی غیاثی، تهران: بزرگمهر.
مالمیر، تیمور و حسین­پناهی، فردین. (1391). «بررسی ساختاری داستان بیژن و منیژه». متن­پژوهی ادبی، ش.  53، صص109- 132. Doi. 10.22054/ltr.2012.6587
معین­فر، محمدجعفر. (1383). «هدهد و رمز او».‌ دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه اصفهان. ش. 38، صص11- 30.  
 میرهاشمی، سید مرتضی و سعادتی­نیا، زهرا. (1395).«ریخت­شناسی افسانه ماهان مصری». متن­پژوهی ادبی، سال 20 ،ش70. صص73- 89. Doi.  10.22054/ltr.2017.7158
نصیری­جامی،حسن (1385).«رازمندی باد صبا در شعر حافظ».‌ ادبیات فارسی، ش. 9. صص151- 171.
واثق­عباسی، عبدالله، مشهدی، محمدامیر، رضایی، رؤیا، ( ۱۳۹۴)، «تحلیل جایگاه اسطوره باد در شاهنامه» شعرپژوهی، ش.۲۵صص ۱۵3- 170. doi.10.22099/jba.2015.3032
یلمه‌ها، احمدرضا (1391). «محب و محبوب، منظومۀ غنایی نفیس و ناشناخته»، پژوهشنامۀ ادب غنایی، ش18، صص199‑217.
یلمه‌ها، احمدرضا (1390). «آموزه‌های تعلیمی در منظومۀ غنایی محب و محبوب»، تحقیقات تمثیلی در زبان و ادب فارسی، ش 9، صص 11‑28.
یلمه­ها، احمدرضا. (1398).«نسخه­ای تازه­یافته از محب و محبوب».‌ نسخه شناسی متون نظم و نثر فارسی. ش. 12، صص65- 96.