نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلیسینا، همدان، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلیسینا، همدان، ایران.
3 دانشیار گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و زبانهای خارجی، دانشگاه اراک، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
"Ruzbihan Baqli Shirazi," in the mid-sixth century AH, presents an image of "Hallaj" in his Sharh al-Shatahiyat (Commentary on Ecstatic Sayings) that embodies multiple components of "Illuminationist" (Ishraqi) thought. Sheikh Shattah, in analyzing Hallaj's ideas and ecstatic words, adopts principles such as the unity of existence (wahdat al-wujud), the primacy of mystical intuition, adherence to ancient and arcane wisdom, the concept of divine love, and the hierarchy of light as his framework. Contrary to certain negative assumptions or prevalent biases among prominent Sufi figures of his time, Ruzbihan engages in profound hermeneutical interpretation and praise of Hallaj and his ideas. Ruzbihan was a contemporary of the founder of Illuminationist philosophy, "the Martyred Suhrawardi," with no recorded interaction between the two and Illuminationist thought is evident in the Sharh al-Shathiyyat. Moreover, in the genealogy of Illuminationist wisdom, Ruzbihan's name and works are seldom mentioned. Thus, this study examines the elements that can be considered manifestations of Illuminationist thought in Ruzbihan's interpretations of Hallaj's ecstatic sayings, demonstrating that Illuminationist ideas existed in various forms among Iranians before being systematized by Suhrawardi. Within this framework, "Ruzbihan's Romantic Sufism" emerges as one of its influenced manifestations; a phenomenon most vividly embodied in the portrait Ruzbihan paints of Hallaj and his teachings.
Introduction
Illuminationist philosophy (Hikmat al-Ishraq) is an intellectual-mystical system fundamentally linked with the name of Shihab al-Din Suhrawardi (6th century AH/12th century CE). However, manifestations of this wisdom were present in the works of Muslim thinkers prior to him. This research examines the hypothesis that Ruzbihan Baqli Shirazi, a contemporary of Suhrawardi, engaged in a rereading and interpretation of the teachings and ecstatic utterances (Shatahiyat) of Husayn ibn Mansur al-Hallaj in his prominent work Sharh al-Shatahiyat (The Explanation of Ecstatic Sayings) from the perspective of Illuminationist thought. Although Ruzbihan Baqli and Suhrawardi were contemporaries, there is no independent account of direct intellectual exchange between them. This fact strengthens the possibility that both drew from common intellectual sources and a pre-existing undercurrent of Illuminationist wisdom in Iran prior to Suhrawardi's time. The aim of this article is to analyze the components of Illuminationist thought within the portrayal of Hallaj sketched by Ruzbihan and to demonstrate his intellectual alignment with Suhrawardi, working independently of one another in interpreting the mystical legacy of Hallaj.
Materials and Methods
This study was conducted using a descriptive-analytical method, relying on library sources. The primary source material is Ruzbihan Baqli's Sharh-e Shatahiyat (edited by Henry Corbin), the major part of which is dedicated to explaining and interpreting the Shatahiyat of Hallaj. The theoretical framework of the research is based on Suhrawardi's "Illuminationist Philosophy" and its fundamental components, such as the Theory of Light, the Oneness of Being (Wahdat al-Wujud), Divine Love, the primacy of Intuitive Unveiling, and reference to Ancient Wisdom. Accordingly, Ruzbihan's interpretations of Hallaj's statements were analyzed using this framework, and the underlying Illuminationist elements were extracted. Furthermore, to better elucidate the similarities, Suhrawardi's views, particularly Hikmat al-Ishraq (The Philosophy of Illumination) were discussed as well.
Results and Discussion
The analysis of Sharh-e Shatahiyat reveals that Ruzbihan Baqli redefines Hallaj within a framework that is thoroughly Illuminationist and consistent with the principles of this school. The following section discusses the most significant Illuminationist components identified in the portrayed figure of Hallaj.
Oneness of Being (Wahdat al-Wujud): Ruzbihan depicts Hallaj as a mystic believer in the Oneness of Being, who professes "annihilation" (Fana) in the Divine Reality and union with Him. The interpretation of the ecstatic saying "I am the Truth" (Ana'l-Haqq) through the metaphor of the "Mirror," found in both Ruzbihan's works and the writings of Suhrawardi, attests to this claim. In this perspective, the mystic, like a polished mirror, reflects only the manifestation of the Truth, and all "duality" (du'i) is eradicated.
Divine Love ('Ishq-i Ilahi /Farr): By transcending the concept of "affection" (Mahabbat) and focusing on "Divine Love, Ruzbihan introduces Hallaj as a symbol of "Passionate Sufism" (Tasawwuf-i 'Ashiqanah). This outlook is connected to the concept of "Farr" (Divine Glory, Royal Splendour) in the ancient Iranian Khusrawani wisdom and Platonic thought, a connection also emphasized by Henry Corbin. Love is considered the primary motivator of Hallaj's spiritual path (Suluk) and the source of his ecstatic utterances.
Luminocentric Ontology: Hallaj's understanding of existence, as reported by Ruzbihan, is based on a hierarchy of light. Ruzbihan quotes him referring to God as the "Light of Lights" (Nur al-Anwar), the Active Intellect as the "World of Light", and the saints (Awliya) as "Lights" (Anwar). Even other beings partake in the "Lights of Manifestation. This perspective is entirely consistent with the luminous system of Suhrawardi's Illuminationist philosophy.
Reference to Ancient Wisdom and 'Strange Chains of Transmission' (Asanid-i Gharib): Ruzbihan presents Hallaj as a narrator of "Ancient Wisdom" (Hikmat-i Qadima) and one acquainted with the "Secret of Hermes." Hallaj bases his statements on "Asanid-i Gharib," which is a chain of transmission comprising metaphysical narrators and mythical figures (such as Kayumars, Faridun, Plato, and celestial beings). This method is analogous to Suhrawardi's approach of referencing "Ancient Sages" (Hukama-i 'Atiq) and the "Khusrawaniyun" (Persian Illuminationists) to validate his teachings.
Primacy of Intuitive Unveiling and Mystical Insight: Ruzbihan insists that the origin of Hallaj's words and ecstatic sayings was "unveiling" (Kashf), "mystical insight" (Mukashafah), and "inspiration" (Ilham), rather than discursive reason. To justify Hallaj's ecstatic statements (such as his devotion to Iblis and Pharaoh), he emphasizes the necessity of moving beyond the outward form of words and comprehending their inspired inner dimension. This emphasis on the primacy of intuition is also a cornerstone of Suhrawardi's Illuminationist philosophy.
Conclusion
The present investigation demonstrates that the figure of Hallaj in Ruzbihan Baqli's Sharh-e Shatahiyat serves as a perfect mirror reflecting Illuminationist thought. Ruzbihan, independently of and concurrently with Suhrawardi, undertook a reconstruction of Hallaj's figure in which the principal components of Illuminationist philosophy—namely, the Oneness of Being, Divine Love, a luminocentric ontology, belief in perennial wisdom, and the precedence of intuition over rational demonstration—are vividly manifested. This intellectual alignment indicates the existence of a fertile intellectual groundwork in 6th-century AH/12th-century CE Iran conducive to the emergence of Illuminationist philosophy, which found expression both in the systematic form of Suhrawardi's school and in the "Passionate Sufism" of Ruzbihan Baqli. Consequently, it can be argued that Illuminationist ideas were present and influential, in a vibrant and dynamic form, within the practical and theoretical mysticism of figures like Ruzbihan, even before they were formally systematized into a philosophical doctrine by Suhrawardi.
کلیدواژهها [English]