شگردهای سعدی در پایان بندی غزل

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

2 دانش‌آموختۀ کارشناسی ارشد، گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.

چکیده

تسلط سعدی به‌عنوان استاد سخن، بر ظرایف و امکانات زبان فارسی، و مهارت او در روایتگری موجب شده توجهی خاص به پایان‌بندی در غزل داشته باشد. جستار حاضر با رویکردی توصیفی­ـ­تحلیلی، پایان­بندی غزل‌های سعدی را از منظر بلاغت، شگردهای زبانی، محتوا و مخاطب بررسی کرده است. سعدی از شگردهای ادبی مانند انواع جناسها و تکرارها، مناظره، تقابل و تقارن برای بیان مفاهیمی چون وفاداری و پایداری در عشق، مفاخره و دفاع از خود در برابر ملامتگران بهره می‌گیرد. از منظر ویژگی­های زبانی، مواردی چون هنجارگریزی نحوی، کاربرد «واو»های هنری، فصل و برخی ویژگی­های سبک خراسانی، پایان­بندی سعدی را از هنجارهای معمول متمایز می‌کند و نقش مؤثری در تقویت موسیقی و برجسته­سازی معنی دارد. غالب مشخصه­های غزل سعدی را در ابیات پایانی نیز می­توان دید. با این حال، نمود مفاخره و مناظره در این ابیات، بیش از متن غزل است. بر اساس یافته­های پژوهش، پایان­بندی، نقطۀ اوج ساختاری و معنایی غزل سعدی است؛ جایی که شاعر با تمرکز بر تخلّص و جمع­بندی عاطفی یا حکمت­آمیز، لایه­های اصلی گفتمان غزل را در قالب بیانی موجز و مؤثر به­تصویر می­کشد و از این طریق، انسجام کلّی و ضربۀ پایانی را تقویت می­کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Sa'di’s Techniques in Ending Ghazals

نویسندگان [English]

  • Najmeh Nazari 1
  • Fatemeh sadat Mousavi, 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
2 M.S. Department of Persian Language & Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Sa'di’s mastery as a supreme craftsman of Persian eloquence, along with his command of linguistic subtleties and narrative skill, has led him to pay special attention to the poetic ending in the ghazal. This study, using a descriptive-analytical approach, examines the endings of Sa'di’s ghazals from the perspectives of rhetoric, linguistic devices, thematic content, and audience engagement. Sa'di makes use of literary techniques such as various types of paronomasia and repetition, dialogue and debate, contrast and symmetry to express concepts such as loyalty and constancy in love, self-praise, and self-defense against reproachers. From a linguistic standpoint, features such as syntactic deviation, the artistic use of the connective "waw" (and), omission, and certain characteristics associated with the Khorasani style distinguish the ending from conventional norms and play an effective role in enhancing musicality and intensifying meaning. Most of the hallmark features of Sa'di’s ghazal can also be observed in the final verses; however, manifestations of self-praise and debate appear more prominently in the ending than in the rest of the poem. According to the findings, the ending constitutes the structural and semantic climax of Sa'di’s ghazal. A point at which, with a focus on the emotional or wisdom-laden synthesis, the poet presents the core layers of the ghazal’s discourse in a concise and impactful form, thereby reinforcing overall coherence and delivering the final poetic effect.
Introduction
Examining and analyzing various techniques of ending literary works not only reveals the author’s creativity and craftsmanship in narration, but also plays a significant role in shaping the reader’s understanding of the work as a whole and the author’s perspective. Among classical Persian ghazal poets, Sa'di Shirazi skillfully employs diverse narrative elements to create coherence and enhance the expressive power of his poetry. Sa'di’s mastery of storytelling, evident in Golestan and Bustan, also appears in his ghazals. This narrative sensibility can be traced in his artistic openings and particularly in his sophisticated endings. In the closing couplets of Sa'di’s ghazals, one observes a range of literary and narrative techniques, linguistic artistry, and multiple forms of foregrounding. Regarding the research background, it should be noted that Elhami and Mousavi, in their article “A Study of the Methods of Ending in Sa'di’s Ghazals,” have examined the meanings employed in the endings. this article does not address statistical analysis or the linguistic, literary, and narrative techniques.
Materials and Methods
Adopting a descriptive–analytical approach and relying on library-based sources, this study seeks to investigate the linguistic, rhetorical, and stylistic features of Sa'di’s ghazal endings at a trans-textual level. It aims to show how these features contribute to conveying and elucidating the poet’s worldview and his romantic, didactic, and discursive messages. Through discourse analysis, the study further reveals how audience positioning and the structural components of the ghazal’s ending reflect experiences of love, self-praise, and the poet’s defense against reproachers. Moreover, analyzing Sa'di’s endings enables comparison with common ending strategies in the Khorasani and Iraqi poetic styles.
Discussion
The modes of closure in Sa'di’s ghazals may be analyzed in four categories: linguistic, literary, thematic, and audience-centered strategies. His linguistic and literary devices at the end of a ghazal serve to reinforce meaning and heighten emotional impact. He draws on rhetorical techniques such as various forms of punning and repetition, dialogue-like structures, contrast and symmetry to express the concepts of loyalty, steadfastness in love, self-praise, and defense against reproachers. Sa'di’s extensive and artful use of verbal ornaments enhances the inner musicality, visual elegance, euphony, and imaginative quality of the verse, thereby intensifying its meaning and emotional resonance. This richness reflects his sensitivity to the internal rhythm of poetry, his refined taste in word choice and composition, his mastery of Persian linguistic resources, and his awareness of the emotional and aesthetic effects of sound patterns in concluding lines.
In the final couplets, Sa'di elevates the poem through the use of semantic figures, metaphorical expression, imagery, and layered relations of meaning. These lines often present the distilled essence of experience, romantic sentiment, or moral reflection in a concise and artistic manner, highlighting the poem’s final message through the fusion of meaning and imagination. At the same time, his use of literary techniques remains free of artificiality, maintaining the balance between rhetorical ornamentation and simplicity characteristic of his sahl-o-momtaneʿ style. From a linguistic perspective, features such as syntactic deviation, artistic use of waw (paratactic conjunctions), ellipsis, and elements associated with the Khorasani style distinguish Sa'di’s endings from conventional norms and contribute to both enhanced musicality and semantic foregrounding, while simultaneously allowing for brevity and intensified emotional expression.
The findings show that most of the defining traits of Sa'di’s ghazals also appear in their endings. However, self-praise and dialogic argumentation occur more frequently in the concluding lines than in the body of the poem. Sa'di uses dialogic structures to present differing viewpoints- especially on themes of love and beauty, and to defend himself against reproachers through realistic, argumentative, and sometimes humorous expression. His frequent use of self-praise regarding poetic mastery and his defense against critics of love and nazargāhī reflect both a conscious awareness of his poetic status and his social disposition, including his desire for reputation and his deep engagement with people. Sa'di’s identity as a moral teacher also leads him to incorporate ethical reflections in the endings of some ghazals. Moreover, his strategic use of audience address, particularly addressing himself or the beloved, enables the articulation of self-praise, self-defense, and the representation of emotional experience.
Conclusion
The findings indicate that Sa'di’s endings embody a harmonious synthesis of aesthetics, wisdom, literary mastery, and emotional intensity, serving as the peak of meaning and feeling within the ghazal. Consequently, they play a central role in conveying the poet’s message and reinforcing his ethical and romantic values, reflecting his distinct worldview in love, morality, and poetic artistry. Given the clarity and simplicity of Sa'di’s poetic style, intricate or ambiguous endings have no place in his ghazals; rather, he delivers his final message with precision, eloquence, and sahl-o-momtaneʿ expression. The ending forms the structural and semantic climax of Sa'di’s ghazal, where through a concise emotional or moral conclusion, the main layers of the poem’s discourse are foregrounded in a brief yet impactful statement.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sa'di
  • Ghazal
  • Ending
  • Good Ending-Verse
  قرآن کریم
    اشراقی، زیبا (1397)، زیبایی‌شناسی تکرار در غزل سعدی. پایان‌نامۀ دکتری تقی پورنامداریان، دانشگاه تهران، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی.
بهار، محمدتقی (1373)، سبک‌شناسی، جلد سوم، تهران، امیرکبیر.
        توکلی، حمیدرضا (1389)، از اشارت‌های دریا؛ بوطیقای روایت در مثنوی، تهران، مروارید.
حقوقی، محمد (1381)، حد همین است، تهران، قطره.
دانیل، چندلر (1386)، مبانی نشانه‌شناسی، ترجمۀ مهدی پارسا، تهران، سورۀ مهر.
ذوالفقاری، حسن (1386)، «تقارن‌ها و تناسب‌ها در گلستان سعدی»، پژوهشنامۀ زبان و ادب فارسی، سال 1، ش4، ص 91-110.
رازی، شمس‌الدین محمد بن قیس (1336)، المعجم فی معاییر اشعار العجم، تصحیح محمد قزوینی و مدرس رضوی، تهران، دانشگاه تهران.
سعدی، مصلح بن عبدالله (1385)، غزل‌های سعدی، تصحیح و توضیح غلام‌حسین یوسفی، تهران، سخن.
شفیعی کدکنی، محمدرضا (1371)، شاعر آینه­ها؛ بررسی سبک هنری و شعر بیدل، تهران، آگاه.
شفیعی کدکنی، محمدرضا (1375)، صور خیال در شعر فارس،. تهران، آگاه.
شفیعی کدکنی، محمدرضا (1391)، موسیقی شعر، تهران، آگه.
شمیسا، سیروس (1383)، نگاهی تازه به بدیع، تهران، میترا.
صفوی، کوروش (1394)،  از زبان­شناسی به ادبیات؛ نظم، تهران، سورۀ مهر.
مارتین، والاس (1386)، نظریه‌های روایت، ترجمۀ محمد شهبا، تهران، هرمس.
میرصادقی، جمال و ذوالقدر، میمنت (1388)، واژه‌نامۀ هنر داستان‌نویسی، تهران، کتاب مهناز.
ناتل خانلری، پرویز (1377)، تاریخ زبان فارسی، جلد سوم، تهران، فردوس.
وحیدیان کامیار، تقی (1379)، بدیع از دیدگاه زیبایی‌شناسی، تهران، دوستان.